We use cookies to enhance your experience on our website. By continuing to use our website, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. You can change your cookie settings at any time. Find out more

E-book purchase
Choose a subscription

Downloaded copy on your device does not expire. Includes 4 years of Bookshelf Online.

close

Where applicable, tax will be added to the above price prior to payment.

E-book purchasing help

Cover

Significant Cases in Criminal Procedure

Second Edition

Craig Hemmens, Alan Thompson, and Lisa S. Nored

Publication Date - January 2013

ISBN: 9780199957910

240 pages
Paperback
8 x 10 inches

In Stock

A flexible text providing summaries and analysis of the key cases in criminal procedure

Description

Easily accessible to undergraduates, Significant Cases in Criminal Procedure, Second Edition, offers a clear, comprehensive introduction to criminal procedure. Rather than providing complete opinions, which may overwhelm students, the authors present case briefs, along with analyses, explanations, and short excerpts.

In addition to the case summaries, the book includes lists of all of the cases it covers, both in alphabetical order and grouped by topic; a short introduction to each topic; and an index.

CRIMINAL JUSTICE CASE BRIEFS SERIES

Significant Cases in Criminal Procedure, Second Edition
Craig Hemmens, Alan Thompson, and Lisa S. Nored (978-0-19-995791-0)

Significant Cases in Corrections, Second Edition
Craig Hemmens, Barbara Belbot, and Katherine Bennett (978-0-19-994858-1)

Significant Cases in Juvenile Justice, Second Edition
Craig Hemmens, Benjamin Steiner, and David Mueller (978-0-19-995841-2)

New to this Edition

  • Additional cases throughout including Arizona v. Gant (2009), Kentucky v. King (2011), and United States v. Jones (2012)
  • New discussion questions and a new glossary of key terms
  • New key excerpts from the opinions along with analyses and explanations

Previous Publication Date(s)

April 2004

Reviews

"A valuable and accessible resource for students studying criminal procedure. The case briefs provide an excellent, in-depth examination and analysis of significant Supreme Court cases in a brief and concise manner. Students find this approach less intimidating, and more engaging and user-friendly." --Stephane Kirven, Sacred Heart University

"The strategy of providing case briefs rather than opinion text is good, as students tend to have trouble understanding opinions themselves. I also like very much that the authors explain the significance of the case; it is hard to get students to understand that these cases are not just empty rhetoric or ivory-tower battles of intellect--they matter to the day-to-day administration of criminal justice. The writing style is also good and I believe that it is as engaging as textbook writing can be." --Jacinta M. Gau, University of Central Florida

Table of Contents

    Chapter One: The Exclusionary Rule
    Weeks v. United States, 232 U.S. 383 (1914)
    Rochin v. California, 342 U.S. 165 (1952)
    Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 (1961)
    Wong Sun v. United States, 371 U.S. 471 (1963)
    Nix v. Williams, 467 U.S. 431 (1984)
    United States v. Leon, 468 U.S. 897 (1984)
    Massachusetts v. Sheppard, 468 U.S. 981 (1984)
    Minnesota v. Olson, 495 U.S. 91 (1990)
    Arizona v. Evans, 514 U.S. 1 (1995)
    Herring v. United States, 555 U.S. 135 (2009)
    Davis v. United States, --- U.S. --- (2011)
    Chapter Two: What Constitutes Probable Cause?
    Beck v. Ohio, 379 U.S. 89 (1964)
    Draper v. United States, 358 U.S. 307 (1959)
    Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213 (1983)
    Illinois v. Caballes, 543 U.S. 405 (2005)
    Chapter Three: Stop and Frisk
    Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968)
    Adams v. Williams, 407 U.S. 143 (1972)
    United States v. Hensley, 469 U.S. 221 (1985)
    United States v. Sokolow, 490 U.S. 1 (1989)
    Alabama v. White, 496 U.S. 325 (1990)
    Minnesota v. Dickerson, 508 U.S. 366 (1993)
    Florida v. J. L., 529 U.S. 266 (2000)
    Illinois v. Wardlow, 528 U.S. 119 (2000)
    Arizona v. Johnson, 555 U.S. 323 (2009)
    Chapter Four: When Has A Seizure Occurred?
    Schmerber v. California, 384 U.S. 757 (1966)
    Michigan v. Chesternut, 486 U.S. 567 (1988)
    Brower v. County of Inyo, 489 U.S. 593 (1989)
    California v. Hodari D., 499 U.S. 621 (1991)
    Florida v. Bostick, 501 U.S. 429 (1991)
    Bond v. United States, 529 U.S. 334 (2000)
    Kyllo v. United States, 533 U.S. 27 (2001)
    Illinois v. McArthur, 531 U.S. 326 (2001)
    Hiibel v. Nevada, 542 U.S. 177 (2004)
    Muehler v. Mena, 544 U.S. 93 (2005)
    Brendlin v. California, 551 U.S. 249 (2007)
    Chapter Five: Arrest
    United States v. Watson, 423 U.S. 411 (1976)
    Dunaway v. New York, 442 U.S. 200 (1979)
    Payton v. New York, 445 U.S. 573 (1980)
    Welsh v. Wisconsin, 466 U.S. 740 (1984)
    United States v. Alvarez-Machain, 504 U.S. 655 (1992)
    Atwater v. City of Lago Vista, 532 U.S. 318 (2001)
    Chapter Six: Standards for the Use of Force
    Tennessee v. Garner, 471 U.S. 1 (1985)
    Graham v. Connor, 490 U.S. 396 (1989)
    Scott v. Harris, 550 U.S. 372 (2007)
    Chapter Seven: Searches With Warrants
    Coolidge v. New Hampshire, 403 U.S. 443 (1971)
    Zurcher v. Stanford Daily, 436 U.S. 547 (1978)
    Mincey v. Arizona, 437 U.S. 385 (1978)
    Steagald v. United States, 451 U.S. 204 (1981)
    Michigan v. Summers, 452 U.S. 692 (1981)
    Maryland v. Garrison, 480 U.S. 79 (1987)
    California v. Greenwood, 486 U.S. 35 (1988)
    Minnesota v. Carter, 525 U.S. 83 (1998)
    Groh v. Ramirez, 540 U.S. 551 (2004)
    U.S. v. Jones, 132 S.Ct. 945 (2012)
    Chapter Eight: The Knock and Announce Rule
    Wilson v. Arkansas, 514 U.S. 927 (1995)
    Richards v. Wisconsin, 520 U.S. 385 (1997)
    United States v. Banks, 540 U.S. 31 (2003)
    Hudson v. Michigan, 547 U.S. 586 (2006)
    Chapter Nine: Search Incident to Arrest
    Warden v. Hayden, 387 U.S. 294 (1967)
    Chimel v. California, 395 U.S. 752 (1969)
    Vale v. Louisiana, 399 U.S. 30 (1970)
    United States v. Robinson, 414 U.S. 218 (1973)
    United States v. Edwards, 415 U.S. 800 (1974)
    Maryland v. Buie, 494 U.S. 325 (1990)
    Virginia v. Moore, 553 U.S. 164 (2006)
    Arizona v. Gant, 556 U.S. 332 (2009)
    Chapter Ten: Consent Searches
    Stoner v. California, 376 U.S. 483 (1964)
    Bumper v. North Carolina, 391 U.S. 543 (1968)
    Schneckloth v. Bustamonte, 412 U.S. 218 (1973)
    Florida v. Royer, 460 U.S. 491 (1983)
    Illinois v. Rodriguez, 497 U.S. 177 (1990)
    Florida v. Jimeno, 500 U.S. 248 (1991)
    United States v. Drayton et al., 536 U.S. 194 (2002)
    Georgia v. Randolph, 547 U.S. 103 (2006)
    Chapter Eleven: Plain View Searches
    Texas v. Brown, 460 U.S. 730 (1983)
    Arizona v. Hicks, 480 U.S. 321 (1987)
    Horton v. California, 496 U.S. 128 (1990)
    Chapter Twelve: Open Fields Searches
    Oliver v. United States, 466 U.S. 170 (1984)
    California v. Ciraolo, 476 U.S. 207 (1986)
    United States v. Dunn, 480 U.S. 294 (1987)
    Chapter Thirteen: Vehicle Searches
    Carroll v. United States, 267 U.S. 132 (1925)
    Chambers v. Maroney, 399 U.S. 42 (1970)
    Delaware v. Prouse, 440 U.S. 648 (1979)
    New York v. Belton, 453 U.S. 454 (1981)
    United States v. Ross, 456 U.S. 798 (1982)
    Michigan v. Long, 463 U.S. 1032 (1983)
    California v. Carney, 471 U.S. 386 (1985)
    Florida v. Wells, 495 U.S. 1 (1990)
    California v. Acevedo, 500 U.S. 565 (1991)
    Ohio v. Robinette, 519 U.S. 33 (1996)
    Pennsylvania v. Labron, 518 U.S. 938 (1996)
    Whren v. United States, 517 U.S. 806 (1996)
    Maryland v. Wilson, 519 U.S. 408 (1997)
    Knowles v. Iowa, 525 U.S. 113 (1998)
    Wyoming v. Houghton, 526 U.S. 295 (1999)
    Maryland v. Pringle, 540 U.S. 366 (2003)
    Illinois v. Lidster, 540 U.S. 419 (2004)
    Chapter Fourteen: Regulatory Searches
    South Dakota v. Opperman, 428 U.S. 364 (1976)
    Illinois v. Lafayette, 462 U.S. 640 (1983)
    Camara v. Municipal Court, 387 U.S. 523 (1967)
    New York v. Burger, 482 U.S. 691 (1987)
    United States v. Martinez-Fuerte, 428 U.S. 543 (1976)
    Michigan Department of State Police v. Sitz, 496 U.S. 444 (1990)
    City of Indianapolis v. Edmond, 531 U.S. 32 (2000)
    New Jersey v. T.L.O., 469 U.S. 325 (1985)
    O'Connor v. Ortega, 480 U.S. 709 (1987)
    Vernonia School District 47J v. Acton, 515 U.S. 646 (1995)
    Ferguson v. Charleston, 523 U.S. 67 (2001)
    Board of Education of Independent School District v. Earls, 536 U.S. 822 (2002)
    Griffin v. Wisconsin, 483 U.S. 868 (1987)
    Brigham City v. Stuart, 547 U.S. 398 (2006)
    United States v. Knights, 534 U.S. 112 (2001)
    Ontario v. Quon, 560 U.S. --- (2010)
    Kentucky v. King, --- U.S. --- (2011)
    Chapter Fifteen: Electronic Surveillance
    Olmstead v. United States, 277 U.S. 438 (1928)
    Berger v. New York, 388 U.S. 41 (1967)
    Katz v. United States, 389 U.S. 347 (1967)
    United States v. Karo, 468 U.S. 705 (1984)
    United States v. Jones, --- U.S. --- (2012)
    Chapter Sixteen: Pretrial Identification Procedures
    United States v. Wade, 388 U.S. 218 (1967)
    Kirby v. Illinois, 406 U.S. 682 (1972)
    Manson v. Brathwaite, 432 U.S. 98 (1977)
    United States v. Crews, 445 U.S. 463 (1980)
    Perry v. New Hampshire, --- U.S. --- (2012)
    Chapter Seventeen: Right to Counsel
    Powell et al. v. Alabama, 287 U.S. 45 (1932)
    Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335 (1963)
    Escobedo v. Illinois, 378 U.S. 478 (1964)
    Massiah v. United States, 377 U.S. 201 (1964)
    United States v. Henry, 447 U.S. 264 (1980)
    Rothgery v. Gillespie County, 554 U.S. 191 (2008)
    Kansas v. Ventris, 556 U.S. --- (2009)
    Montejo v. Louisiana, 556 U.S. 778 (2009)
    Chapter Eighteen: The Development and Scope of the Miranda Warnings
    Brown v. Mississippi, 297 U.S. 278 (1936)
    Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966)
    Edwards v. Arizona, 451 U.S. 477 (1981)
    South Dakota v. Neville, 459 U.S. 553 (1983)
    Berkemer v. McCarty, 468 U.S. 420 (1984)
    New York v. Quarles, 467 U.S. 649 (1984)
    Oregon v. Elstad, 70 U.S. 298 (1985)
    Colorado v. Connelly, 479 U.S. 157 (1986)
    Colorado v. Spring, 479 U.S. 564 (1987)
    Patterson v. Illinois, 487 U.S. 285 (1988)
    Arizona v. Roberson, 486 U.S. 675 (1988)
    Duckworth v. Eagan, 492 U.S. 195 (1989)
    Minnick v. Mississippi, 498 U.S. 146 (1990)
    Pennsylvania v. Muniz, 496 U.S. 582 (1990)
    Arizona v. Fulminante, 499 U.S. 279 (1991)
    McNeil v. Wisconsin, 501 U.S. 171 (1991)
    Davis v. United States, 512 U.S. 452 (1994)
    Missouri v. Seibert, 542 U.S. 600 (2004)
    U.S. v. Patane, 542 U.S. 360 (2004)
    Florida v. Powell, 559 U.S. --- (2010)
    Maryland v. Shatzer, 559 U.S. --- (2010)
    Berghuis v. Thompkins, 560 U.S. --- (2010)
    J.D.B. v. North Carolina, 564 U.S. --- (2011)
    Chapter Nineteen: What Constitutes Interrogation?
    Brewer v. Williams, 430 U.S. 387 (1977)
    Rhode Island v. Innis, 446 U.S. 291 (1980)
    Arizona v. Mauro, 481 U.S. 520 (1987)
    Chapter Twenty: Civil Liability
    Monroe v. Pape, 365 U.S. 167 (1961)
    Monell v. Department of Social Services of New York, 436 U.S. 658 (1978)
    Owen v. City of Independence, 445 U.S. 622 (1980)
    Malley v. Briggs, 475 U.S. 335 (1986)
    City of Canton v. Harris, 489 U.S. 378 (1989)
    Will v. Michigan Department of State Police, 491 U.S. 58 (1989)
    Board of the County Commissioners of Bryan County v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397 (1997)
    McMillian v. Monroe County, 520 U.S. 781 (1997)
    County of Sacramento v. Lewis, 523 U.S. 833 (1998)
    Saucier v. Katz, 533 U.S. 194 (2001)
    Castle Rock v. Gonzales, 545 U.S. 748 (2005)
    Pearson v. Callahan, 555 U.S. --- (2010)

Related Titles