(Un)intended Consequences of EU Parliamentary Elections

Edited by Wouter van der Brug and Claes H. de Vreese

Provides different disciplinary perspectives, bringing together electorial researchers and media effect researchers
Features contributors from leading scholars in the field
Provides a rigorous and detailed exploration of European Parliament elections

(Un)intended Consequences of EU Parliamentary Elections

Edited by Wouter van der Brug and Claes H. de Vreese

Description

When direct elections for the European Parliament were first organized in 1979, the idea was that such direct elections would increase the democratic legitimacy and accountability of the Parliament. Moreover, the elections were expected to raise public interest, engagement and support for the European project. Did these elections help to increase legitimacy and accountability? Did they increase interest in and support for the 'European project'? Or, did these elections have unintended (and perhaps undesirable) consequences? This volume focuses on the consequences of European elections for public debate and involvement, for party systems, and for public opinion.

EP elections have caused a number of intended consequences: the salience of the elections in the media has gone up and over time electoral competition becomes more important, engaging in the campaign can help improve EU evaluations, and Europe as a topic has become more important for voting at EP elections, boosting the prevalence of so-called EU voting. A number of intended consequences have not materialized during the life of the EP so far: knowledge or turnout levels have not gone up and citizens have not become better at judging what political parties are offering. The EP elections have, however, also yielded a number of unintended consequences: EP elections dampen turnout for first time voters in subsequent elections, EP elections cause temporary decline in EU support, and the elections have become a strategic arena for political parties to position themselves on EU issues and for new movements and parties to boost or sustain their success.

(Un)intended Consequences of EU Parliamentary Elections

Edited by Wouter van der Brug and Claes H. de Vreese

Foreword
1. Introduction, Wouter van der Brug and Claes de Vreese
Part 1: Consequences of European elections for public debate and political involvement
2. Do European elections create a European public sphere?, Hajo Boomgaarden and Claes de Vreese
3. The EU Issue Space, Party Competition and News Coverage of EP Elections, Chris Hanretty and Susan Banducci
4. Knowing Europe? The Causes and Consequences of (Lacking) Knowledge about the EU across Time and Space, Jurgen Maier
5. How European elections decrease turnout, Mark Franklin and Sara Hobolt
Part 2: Consequences of European elections for party systems
6. EU Issue Voting in National and European Parliamentary Elections, Catherine de Vries and Sara Hobolt
7. How European elections affect national party systems: On the survival of newly established parties, Radoslaw Markowski
8. Campaigning on or downplaying EU integration? Explaining the salience parties attach to EU matters in European Parliamentary election campaigns, Silke Adam and Michaela Maier
9. Eurosceptic vote deviation and the impact of news media, Sylvia Kritzinger and David Johann
Part 3: Consequences of European elections for attitudes towards Europe
10. The Negative Effect of Elections to the European Parliament on Diffuse Support for the European Project, Laurie Beaudennet and Mark Franklin
11. Talking it up or talking it down? How national democracy conditions the relationship between talking about and expressing democratic satisfaction with European politics, Hajo Boomgaarden
12. Effects of News Media Coverage on Public Support for European integration, Claes de Vreese & Hajo Boomgaarden
13. European Elections, Euroscepticism and support for anti-EU parties, Wouter van der Brug
Part 4: Looking ahead
14. Conclusion, Claes de Vreese & Wouter van der Brug

(Un)intended Consequences of EU Parliamentary Elections

Edited by Wouter van der Brug and Claes H. de Vreese

Author Information

Wouter van der Brug is Professor of Political Science at the University of Amsterdam. His research interests focus on comparative research in collective political behaviour, in particular electoral behavior, right-wing populism, political communication, political trust and support, and political parties. He published in various international journals, such as the European Journal of Political Research, The British Journal of Political Science, Comparative Political Studies, Electoral Studies, Party Politics, Political Communication, West European Politics, Political Behavior, European Union Politics, Comparative European Politics, and The Journal of Theoretical Politics. In 2007 his monograph The Economy and the Vote (co-authored by Cees van der Eijk and Mark Franklin) was published by Cambridge University Press.

Claes de Vreese is Professor of Political Communication at the University of Amsterdam.
He is the founding Director of the Center for Politics and Communication (www.polcomm.org ). His research interests include EU attitudes, comparative journalism research, the effects of news, public opinion and European integration, effects of information and campaigning on elections, and direct democracy. His research is funded by several science foundation grants. He has received grants from the Dutch and Danish Science Foundations as well as the ERC. He has published 100+ articles in international peer-reviewed journals, including leading journals in political science, communication science, and public opinion research. He is the Editor of Political Communication.

Contributors:

Silke Adam, University of Bern.
Susan Banducci, University of Exeter.
Laurie Beaudennet, University of Montreal.
Hajo Boomgaarden, University of Vienna.
Wouter van der Brug, University of Amsterdam.
Mark Franklin, Trinity College, Conneticut, and European University Institute.
Chris Hanretty, University of East Anglia.
Sara Hobolt, London School of Economics and Political Science.
David Johann, University of Vienna.
Sylvia Kritzinger, University of Vienna.
Jürgen Maier
Michaela Maier, University of Koblenz, Landau.
Radoslaw Markowski, Polish Academy of Sciences, Poland.
Claes de Vreese, University of Amsterdam.
Catherine de Vries, University of Oxford.