Torts and Rights
Robert Stevens
Reviews and Awards
It may not be the text for a practitioner who looks for his law to be pre-processed in such a way that with a minimum amount of warming up and nothing in the way of elaboration it can be served up to the bench and found palatable, but for those who prefer to sharpen their presentations with fresh material and the spice of controversy, this is a book which should be on the shelf and kept within easy reach. - Philip H. Brodie, Edininburgh Law Review 13 (2009) 534.
Review from previous edition 'A valuable contribution to the subject.' - Lord Hoffmann, from the Foreword
Torts and Rights is full of stimulating and provocative analysis and argument, both descriptive and normative. It deserves a large and wide audience. - Peter Cane, Modern Law Review
In Torts and Rights, Stevens has taken the claim of rights-based theorists one step further and in a far-ranging tour de force shows how most of the well-recognised torts can be understood from this perspective. - JW Neyers, King's Law Journal
Whilst Stevens' audience may not find themselves in agreement with all of his conclusions, few will be able to deny the coherence of his presentation or the clarity of his reasoning. Its impact on the law of torts is bound to be significant; tort lawyers, you have been warned. - Sarah Green, Cambridge Law Journal
Packed with a host of valuable insights. - John Murphy, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies
A much clearer and rational analysis of the structure of tort law. - Simon Douglas, Law Quarterly Review
This intelligent and ambitious book is going to influence deeply future discourse. -
It may not be the text for a practitioner who looks for his law to be pre-processed in such a way that with a minimum amount of warming up and nothing in the way of elaboration it can be served up to the bench and found palatable, but for those who prefer to sharpen their presentations with fresh material and the spice controversy, this is a book which should be on the shelf and kept within easy reach. - Edinburgh Law Review