Popular Punishment
On the Normative Significance of Public Opinion
Edited by Jesper Ryberg and Julian V. Roberts
Table of Contents
Contributors
Introduction: Exploring the Normative Significance of Public Opinion for State Punishment, Jesper Ryberg and Julian V. Roberts
Chapter 1: Penal Theory, Moral Intuitions, and Public Opinion, Jesper Ryberg
Chapter 2: Proportionality Theory and Popular Opinion, Matt Matravers
Chapter 3: The Proper Role of Community in Determining Criminal Liability and Punishment, Paul H. Robinson
Chapter 4: Proportionality in Sentencing: The Need to Factor in Community Experience, Not Public Opinion, Mirko Bagaric
Chapter 5: Penal Theory and Popular Opinion: The Deficiencies of Direct Engagement, Jan W. de Keijser
Chapter 6: Why Should We Care What the Public Thinks? A Critical Assessment of the Claims of Popular Punishment, Frej K. Thomsen
Chapter 7: Public Opinion and Democratic Control of Sentencing Policy, Christopher Bennett
Chapter 8: Criminal Prosecutors: Experts or Elected Officials?, Richard L. Lippke
Chapter 9: Stakeholder Sentencing, Thom Brooks
Chapter 10: Repellent Institutions and the Absentee Public: Grounding Opinion in Responsibility for Punishment, Albert W. Dzur
Chapter 11: Clarifying the Significance of Public Opinion for Sentencing Policy and Practice, Julian V. Roberts
Notes
Bibliography
Index