Philosophical Foundations of Evidence Law
Christian Dahlman, Alex Stein, and Giovanni Tuzet
Table of Contents
Evidence, truth and knowledge
1:Evidence and truth, Hock Lai Ho
2:The Naturalized epistemology approach to evidence, Gabriel Broughton, Brian Leiter
3:Proven facts, beliefs and reasoned verdicts, Jordi Ferrer Beltrán
4:The role of the expert witness, Lena Wahlberg, Christian Dahlman
Law and factfinding
5:The role of rules in the law of evidence, Frederick Schauer
6:Excluding evidence for integrity's sake, Jules Holroyd, Federico Picinali
7:Second-personal evidence, Alex Stein
8:Burdens of proof, Mark Spottswood
9:Weight of evidence, Dale Nance
10:Cost-benefit analysis of fact-finding, Talia Fisher
Evidence, language and argumentation
11:Linguistic evidentials and the law of hearsay, Lawrence Solan
12:The pragmatics of evidence discourse, Giovanni Tuzet
13:Argumentation and evidence, Floris Bex
Evidence and explanation
14:Inference to the best explanation, relative plausibility and probability, Ronald Allen, Michael Pardo
15:The scenario theory about evidence in criminal law, Anne Ruth Mackor, Peter van Koppen
16:Coherence in legal evidence, Amalia Amaya
Evidence and probability
17:The logic of inference and decision for scientific evidence, Franco Taroni, Alex Biedermann, Silvia Bozza
18:Bayesianism: objections and rebuttals, Norman Fenton, David Lagnado
19:The problem of the prior in criminal trials, Christian Dahlman, Eivind Kolflaath
20:Generalizations and reference classes, Michael Pardo, Ronald Allen
Proof paradoxes
21:Paradoxes of proof, Mark Spottswood
22:The problem of naked statistical evidence, Christian Dahlman, Amit Pundik
Biases and epistemic injustice
23:Evidence law and empirical psychology, Justin Sevier
24:Relevance through a feminist lens, Julia Simon-Kerr
25:Race, evidence and epistemic injustice, Jasmine Gonzales Rose
26:De-biasing legal fact-finders, Frank Zenker