Chapter 13

Track-Two Diplomacy in East Asia

Pauline Kerr and Brendan Taylor

Studies of track-two diplomacy, that is, analyses of non-state actors (individuals or organizations) involved in diplomacy, are problematic for students.  There are different claims about the purpose and functions of track-two actors and their relationships with track-one, or state, actors. More research is needed to clarify the nature of track-two diplomacy before it can be understood from the perspectives of traditional state-based or "new" multi-actor models which offer contrasting explanations of contemporary diplomacy. This chapter is a response to this challenge. It argues that research based on three comparative studies of track-two diplomacy around environmental, security, and economic issues in East Asia reveal interesting findings. Rather than supporting the new multi-actor diplomacy models, which elevate the importance of non-state actors and their role in track-two diplomacy, it appears that in this region, the traditional state-based model better explains track-two diplomacy. Contemporary diplomacy is changing, but the traditional model still retains explanatory power, at least in East Asia.

Glossary exercises

Takeā€“home messages

Answering the book's "big" questions



Case studies

Counterfactual reasoning exercises

Guide to further reading

Website Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy
Please send comments or suggestions about this Website to